This week, 2,600 tech industry tycoons and entrepreneurs, including Elon Musk, Gary Marcus, and Steve Wozniak, asked the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Institute to suspend its R&D for six months signed an open letter. The signatories argue that the AI Lab is currently in an “uncontrollable race to develop and deploy” the technology and believes safety programs and regulations need to be strengthened. On Thursday, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong opposed this approach, saying people should not “let fear stop progress.”
Debate over AI safety: tech industry leaders have called for a pause in development, and many oppose
An open lettersigned by 2,600 tech industry leaders and researchersrecommends that AI labs pause work for six months and that if they refuse, the government should impose a moratorium on development. The group believes that AI is “now becoming as competitive as humans in common tasks,” and asserts that powerful AI systems should be developed “only after we are confident that their effectiveness is positive and their risks are manageable.”
“Unfortunately, this level of planning and management is not happening. In recent months, AI labs have been in an uncontrollable race to develop and deploy ever more powerful digital minds that no one (not even their creators) can understand, predict, or reliably control,” the open letterstates. Signatories to the letter include Tesla CEO Elon Musk, politician Andrew Yang, AI author Gary Marcus, and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak.
In addition, the letter notes that AI developers need to work with policymakers if they are to create powerful AI systems. The letter emphasizes that AI threatens democracy and has the potential to cause dramatic economic and political disruption. But while the letter has more than 2,000 signatories, not all are in favor of a moratorium,with some calling it“Ridiculous.” “Among the obvious reasons why this temporary pause seems like a ridiculous idea, I can’t help but feel that this may also be a knee-jerk reaction by the corporate elite after seeing how easily this technology renders many of their goods and services useless,” wrote one individual
“This is a bad decision. Forward only,” another individualtweetedOn Thursday, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong shared his opinionon the matter. Armstrong said he does not believe that fear should stop progress and that people should be wary of such plans.” Count me among those who think this is a bad idea,” Armstrong tweeted. There are no “experts” to rule on this issue, and many disparate parties will not agree. Committees and bureaucracy will solve nothing.” Armstrong added:
Like many technologies, there are dangers, but the good outweighs the bad, and we should keep marching toward progress. A marketplace of ideas will yield better results than central planning. We must not let fear stop progress, and we must be wary of those who seek to be ruled by central authority.
Many others believe that a pause in AI development is a bad idea, and some argue that it is a plan to maintain self-preservation by AI monopolies that are already leading the competition. Lee Cronin, Regis professor and CEO of Chemify,writes, “This is nonsense. It’s like asking people to destroy a book that explains how to build a printing press, which itself was printed on a printing press.” Discussion of a pause in AI development has been acontroversialsubject this week, and it is unclear at this time whether the AI Lab will follow through on this proposal.
What do you think about the debate over whether the AI Lab should pause work for six months or continue progress, and how do you think the potential risks of AI development should be managed? Let us know your views in the comments section below.
Image credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons
