While the FTX Co-Founder Claims He ‘Wasn’t Running Alameda,’ SBF Is Asked Why He Threw Caroline Ellison ‘Under the Bus’

Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF ) has given numerous interviews, and in these discussions he has repeatedly explained that, as far as Alameda Research is concerned, he “didn’t run Alameda.” SBF was run by Caroline Ellison, a former Jane Street trader and Stanford graduate, so he wasn’t CEO of trading firm Alameda Research. Ellison has been very quiet since her FTX demise, leading to speculation that she fled Hong Kong to live in Dubai.

Where in the world is Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison? He pointed out that it does not operate Alameda Research, a quantitative cryptocurrency trading firm and market maker that provides liquidity. In an interview with Dealbook Summit, SBF said, “I don’t think he ran Alameda,” further stressing that “I didn’t know the size of their position.”

“I didn’t know exactly what was going on” He told SBF viewers in a Dealbook Summit interview. On paper, SBF indicates that he founded Alameda Research, but despite arguments that dispute his claims, he has stated on several occasions that he is a completely different entity than FTX. claimed. According to the data, at one point Alameda had two of his CEOs, Sam Trabucco and Caroline Ellison. The cryptocurrency community believes that if SBF didn’t know what was going on behind the scenes at Alameda, Trabucco and Ellison must have the answer.

However, Trabucco announced that he would be leaving Alameda on August 24, 2022. He hasn’t spoken since announcing and the whole affair got mixed up. The former co-CEO wrote a cryptic tweet on Nov. 8, 2022 after the FTX disaster began. I hope the road ahead is bright,” said Trabucco . Trabucco left three months before FTX’s demise, leaving Ellison as CEO.

Ellison, the daughter of two of her MIT economists, has not been heard from. But after Coindesk’s Ian Allison published her Nov. 2, 2022 report, she tweeted about Alameda’s balance sheet. For a subset of our corporate entities, we have assets [over $10 billion] that are not reflected in them,” Ellison wrote. It shows some of the long positions, obviously there are hedges that aren’t listed, and we’ve paid off most of our loans by now, given the tight crypto credit markets this year,” said Ellison {57. } added.

Like Trabucco, Ellison said no peeps after her last tweet, and no one has heard from her since. , he “didn’t run Alameda” and was unaware of the position Alameda held, but it still leaves someone to blame. Kim Dotcom ,, in a candid interview on his Twitter Spaces for SBF when asked how people could trust her SBF after “throwing her lover under the bus” , emphasized this factor. SBF is very upset by this question and told Dotcom that it thinks it’s “messed up”. But really, if SBF didn’t know what was going on in Alameda, it’s clear who did.

Ellison has been featured in the media on several occasions, but reports have only gleaned public information from the web. Additionally, the report has been denounced as a puff piece written by the establishment: his CEO of Alameda has not spoken candidly in an exclusive interview with The New York Times, Good Morning He America, or New York Magazine and Bloomberg. No one asked SBF where she is now or what she’s doing about the whole FTX/Alameda debacle while she was her CEO of Alameda. Ellison reportedly fled Hong Kong and fled to Dubai, but reports have not been confirmed. Certain Gulf states, such as the United Arab Emirates, have extradition treaties with the United States. not here.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Exit mobile version